bondドライバに変わって、teamドライバと管理ツールteamd, teamdctlを使いますよという内容。
https://fedorahosted.org/libteam/wiki/Tutorial
bonding driverとの比較。
まぁ、弱点は標準で入ってないところかなw。
LLDP(zero config)とかLACPのload-balancingとかは良さそう
Bonding vs. Team driver features
Feature | Bonding | Team |
---|---|---|
broadcast TX policy | Yes | Yes |
round-robin TX policy | Yes | Yes |
active-backup TX policy | Yes | Yes |
LACP (802.3ad) support | Yes | Yes |
Hash-based TX policy | Yes | Yes |
Highly customizable hash function setup | No | Yes |
TX load-balancing support (TLB) | Yes | Yes |
RX load-balancing support (ALB) | Yes | Planned |
RX load-balancing support (ALB) in bridge or openvswitch | No | Planned |
LACP hash port select | Yes | Yes |
load-balancing for LACP support | No | Yes |
Ethtool link monitoring | Yes | Yes |
ARP link monitoring | Yes | Yes |
NS/NA (IPV6) link monitoring | No | Yes |
ports up/down delays | Yes | Yes |
port priorities and stickiness (“primary” option enhancement) | No | Yes |
separate per-port link monitoring setup | No | Yes |
multiple link monitoring setup | Limited | Yes |
lockless TX/RX path | No (rwlock) | Yes (RCU) |
VLAN support | Yes | Yes |
user-space runtime control | Limited | Full |
Logic in user-space | No | Yes |
Extensibility | Hard | Easy |
Modular design | No | Yes |
Performance overhead | Low | Very Low |
D-Bus interface | No | Yes |
ØMQ interface | No | Yes |
multiple device stacking | Yes | Yes |
zero config using LLDP | No | Planned |