bondドライバに変わって、teamドライバと管理ツールteamd, teamdctlを使いますよという内容。
https://fedorahosted.org/libteam/wiki/Tutorial
bonding driverとの比較。
まぁ、弱点は標準で入ってないところかなw。
LLDP(zero config)とかLACPのload-balancingとかは良さそう
Bonding vs. Team driver features
| Feature | Bonding | Team |
|---|---|---|
| broadcast TX policy | Yes | Yes |
| round-robin TX policy | Yes | Yes |
| active-backup TX policy | Yes | Yes |
| LACP (802.3ad) support | Yes | Yes |
| Hash-based TX policy | Yes | Yes |
| Highly customizable hash function setup | No | Yes |
| TX load-balancing support (TLB) | Yes | Yes |
| RX load-balancing support (ALB) | Yes | Planned |
| RX load-balancing support (ALB) in bridge or openvswitch | No | Planned |
| LACP hash port select | Yes | Yes |
| load-balancing for LACP support | No | Yes |
| Ethtool link monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| ARP link monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| NS/NA (IPV6) link monitoring | No | Yes |
| ports up/down delays | Yes | Yes |
| port priorities and stickiness (“primary” option enhancement) | No | Yes |
| separate per-port link monitoring setup | No | Yes |
| multiple link monitoring setup | Limited | Yes |
| lockless TX/RX path | No (rwlock) | Yes (RCU) |
| VLAN support | Yes | Yes |
| user-space runtime control | Limited | Full |
| Logic in user-space | No | Yes |
| Extensibility | Hard | Easy |
| Modular design | No | Yes |
| Performance overhead | Low | Very Low |
| D-Bus interface | No | Yes |
| ØMQ interface | No | Yes |
| multiple device stacking | Yes | Yes |
| zero config using LLDP | No | Planned |
